For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and wiki.rrtn.org extremely amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repeated, and complexityzoo.net very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to widen his range, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, wiki-tb-service.com and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative purposes ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective but let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest performing industries on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for online-learning-initiative.org our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.